It's lovely isn't it? Its the JWs version of a religious Mexican stand-off, where no one wants to drop their shun gun first, so no one does.... They just keep pointing their shun guns at each other, hoping a spiritual fire-fight doesn't break out. Meanwhile, their lives just pass them by.... (tick, tock, tick.....)
King Solomon
JoinedPosts by King Solomon
-
16
How many doubting Thomases?
by konceptual99 inas an active witness atm i speak reguarly with friends and family who are also active.
it seems however that there are some things that people are comfortable discussing such as beards (whats the problem) and birthdays (everyone would if they could) and, if you are with close friends, things like confusion over the generations, pressure of keeping all the balls juggled, harshness of rules around da/df ones along with long lapsed family and to some extent blood.. my guess is that there are many more who may be in a similar state of mind to me and wondering if it really is all worth it.
it makes me wonder about how many with express themselves more if they could?
-
-
51
District Convention Points Saturday 21-07-2012 New Light? Governing Body Is Our Mother?
by Bubblegum Apotheosis ini have been trying to wrap my head around the talk that introduced the slave as our mother?
the brothers at bethel are worried that we are not treating our spiritual mother with respect.
jehovah is our father, the faithful slave (the governing body) is our spiritual mammy.
-
King Solomon
Mommy = Anthony Perkins reference
The GB is actually a corpse that should've been buried long ago, not propped up in a chair and listened to by the R&F, as if it weren't just a creation of their own psychoses?
OR
Maybe Mums coming home from the shelter for abused women?
Is this an attempt to reintroduce Asherah (YHWH's consort) worship to the tribes of Israel? Maybe God is getting lonely, so He promised not to hit her anymore and to change His ways, and go to anger management?
-
84
Candace Conti v. Watchtower Society - Closing Argument by WTBTS Attorney
by jwleaks injane doe v. watchtower bible and tract society of new york, inc.. .
jury trial - june 14, 2012 - day 10. .
mr. schnack: ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the judge has instructed you that it is your choice to award or not to award punitive damages.
-
King Solomon
"I just want to make it perfectly clear: sure, we were guilty, but at least we are NOT the Catholics!!". Lol! Is that the best they could come up with? They've been found guilty and the answer is to say, "at least we're not them!".
Wonder how many Catholics on the jury appreciated that display of arrogance and hubris?
Loved the "it's been in the press: we are all aware of it" reasoning. Uh, Mr Counselor, you DO realize that you are talking to a jury, and not to a body of elders who's been instructed to do whatever to keep the matter hush-hush? Why not just come out and say, "honest, we really tried to cover this up, we really did...."
-
64
Let's talk about the worst articles from the WT for young people (YPA articles and others).
by Chemical Emotions inat the moment i don't have the wt cd program up, but when i can bring it up, i'll post some.. .
also, articles which include a paragraph here or there that are directed towards children or teens count as well.. articles that come to mind for me first are all the articles dealing with (gasp) masturbation.
and one poster here recently posted some parts from a young people ask article about dating, which was very funny.
-
King Solomon
Billy Boy,
You would dare educate Wise King Solomon on prostate health? Believe me, I have a hard enough time dealing with the frequent trips to the restroom at 2 AM with a 3,000 yr old prostate gland!!
And some further details on the matter as it was explained to me... The YPA crap says that masturbation is bad because it's "selfish" and "idolatry". However, the basic question is, how can you expect someone else to satisfy you sexually if you don't know how your own parts work?
True, but I think many of the women will agree that men's understanding of their what gives a male satisfaction is not the issue here: it's the males inability to get the woman off that's more of a problem...
But that leads us to this:
Rather than your sex life being a puzzle, at least go in knowing your magic spots so that you can inform your partner. And porn can make it all even more educational. If you want to be good at something, you have to spend time practicing and learning from the experts, right?
Yeah, I'd agree in spirit.
But "porn = educational?" Hmmm, that's a questionable assertion, since most of it that I've seen heard about is very much filmed from the male perspective (where from porns, you'd think "spilling one's seed" on a woman's face and in her eye gives her some sort of pleasure? Hmmm....)
This is one of the fundamental errors JWs make, not allowing males AND females to learn from prior experiences. Instead, they're expected to buy each other's cars without the benefit of a test drive, unable to see if they're sexually-compatible? HUGE mistake....
(Another hold-over from the male calculus of thinking, "if she doesn't know any other experiences, then she won't know how much I really suck (or don't suck; wink, wink, nudge nudge) in bed... Flawed logic, all the way around.)
-
64
Let's talk about the worst articles from the WT for young people (YPA articles and others).
by Chemical Emotions inat the moment i don't have the wt cd program up, but when i can bring it up, i'll post some.. .
also, articles which include a paragraph here or there that are directed towards children or teens count as well.. articles that come to mind for me first are all the articles dealing with (gasp) masturbation.
and one poster here recently posted some parts from a young people ask article about dating, which was very funny.
-
King Solomon
Chem Emo emotes:
I love how this whole thread is technically staying on topic and yet is focusing completely on masturbation.
Touche' on the hand-picked choice of appropriate emoticons....
NC stipulates:
I think we should name the book, The Perv and the Neurotic!
Wait: which one am I, again?
Back to Sol: How dare you suggest that any child I taught would have dirty fingers! There is a bottle of Purell within reaching distance from ANYWHERE in this house!
Nevermind: I see you're clearly the neurotic one, the obsessive-compulsive type. So, I'm the.... HEY!!!
The Perv and the Neurotic
By NewChapter and King Solomon
Experts New Chapter and King Solomon offer their timely wisdom on a variety of modern teen issues, in such thought-provoking chapters as "What To Fantasize About During Masturbation" and "Disney Heroines- Why the Appeal?"
Sounds very interesting: I'd read it....
Probably going to have to tidy up the language a bit, if we're going to submit it for publication to Awake, tho! They have very prudish censors there!
-
59
what is the dumbest thing you've been reproved/chided/df'd for?
by rather be in hades ini'm a big science nerd and i remember when we were going over the creator book, that the big bang doesn't necessarily prove there is no god.. i said this comment during book study and the conductor's jaw dropped.
everyone was pretty uncomfortable and it didn't help that he ct me off as i was explaining the red shift and mom wasn't too happy about all that.
i had to do a lot of bible research and write some nonsense about how the big bang was not reality or some sort...ugh.. .
-
King Solomon
LOL I'd rather be dead for all eternity than for five minutes have to put up with a bunch of self rightous vegitarian JW's
Don't tell anyone I said anything to you, but I hear they're considering allowing Fish on Fridays: I don't suppose one day of pesco-vegetarianism would change your mind?
-
64
Let's talk about the worst articles from the WT for young people (YPA articles and others).
by Chemical Emotions inat the moment i don't have the wt cd program up, but when i can bring it up, i'll post some.. .
also, articles which include a paragraph here or there that are directed towards children or teens count as well.. articles that come to mind for me first are all the articles dealing with (gasp) masturbation.
and one poster here recently posted some parts from a young people ask article about dating, which was very funny.
-
King Solomon
Chem emo states:
I, for one, am messed up now. Thanks in advance for the nightmares, Sol.
You've never had the joy of a noctural emission, I'm guessing? :)
Next guide will be, "King Solomon's Guide to Masturbation for Blossoming Young Women".
Here's a preview:
"KEEP YOUR DIRTY FINGERS OUTTA THERE!!!"
-
64
Let's talk about the worst articles from the WT for young people (YPA articles and others).
by Chemical Emotions inat the moment i don't have the wt cd program up, but when i can bring it up, i'll post some.. .
also, articles which include a paragraph here or there that are directed towards children or teens count as well.. articles that come to mind for me first are all the articles dealing with (gasp) masturbation.
and one poster here recently posted some parts from a young people ask article about dating, which was very funny.
-
King Solomon
Back to Sol---and one more thing, when they bring their dates home, I expect them to have faces!
I don't suppose that includes them also having a set of eyes, does it? Eyes are an important element to identifying someone.
I'm thinking about the "if your eye offends you, snatch it out" bit. I'm thinking that one SHOULD work in reverse, too, i.e. snatching OTHER people's eyes out if they offend you?
All I know is, when God is in da' house, someone's blood is gunna be spilled, animal or man.... That's just the way YHWH rolls!
-
64
Let's talk about the worst articles from the WT for young people (YPA articles and others).
by Chemical Emotions inat the moment i don't have the wt cd program up, but when i can bring it up, i'll post some.. .
also, articles which include a paragraph here or there that are directed towards children or teens count as well.. articles that come to mind for me first are all the articles dealing with (gasp) masturbation.
and one poster here recently posted some parts from a young people ask article about dating, which was very funny.
-
King Solomon
OK, there seems to be some confusion on my advice. Let me clarify, kay?
Back to the teens---not that I think you dismembering barbie dolls and fantasizing makes you abnormal, Dears, I'm just uptight.
Yes, I misspoke: "disembodied torsos" is logically impossible, since you cannot remove a torso from itself (the body).
I didn't mean to suggest breastless OR limbless: as NC said, they serve a purpose in the fantasy, as does the sexy upper arm, or a well-formed clavicle, or...... (AHEM!)
What I was originally conceiving of was a fleshbot, a synthetic mass of latex of 90 lbs that has anatomically-correct holes. But the important thing to remember is, NO FACES!!! Faces mean you're able to identify the women, and no identifiable women to look at lustfully means no thought sin has occurred. Gotta keep her abstract, no names! At least, that's how I'm reading Jesus' words....
Carry on: I gotta go take care of something....
-
64
Let's talk about the worst articles from the WT for young people (YPA articles and others).
by Chemical Emotions inat the moment i don't have the wt cd program up, but when i can bring it up, i'll post some.. .
also, articles which include a paragraph here or there that are directed towards children or teens count as well.. articles that come to mind for me first are all the articles dealing with (gasp) masturbation.
and one poster here recently posted some parts from a young people ask article about dating, which was very funny.
-
King Solomon
Kurtbethel,
In fact, the best that centuries of church scholars have come up with to criticize the matter was in Genesis when Onan was struck dead for spilling his seed on the ground and not impregnating his dead brother's wife. Even if he masturbated to produce this emission, the issue is providing some offspring, and that was what he was punished for.
The sin though, was having sex with his brother's widow to impregnate her (as he was obligated to do, per the Torah), but then withdrawing before ejaculating ("spilling his seed", a practice which the rappers today refer to as 'skeet shooting': hmmm, I dunno why?). So he was able to enjoy having sex with her, without producing offspring so his dead brother's name could live on (in our goofy ideas about genetics, we actually thought someone's genes could be passed on in this manner.... The things us guys can dream up, and women will believe! Besides, it's not like the God who created mankind was our God YHWH, and He could've given us laws that actually made any real sense!).
So with this background, the WT spins a bunch of guilt around it with absolutely no scripture to support their position. So one could wonder why this is. When you consider it is pretty much a universal practice, then they cunningly know that they can induce guilt in someone doing it, and they can also induce a portion of the "guilty" to confess this sin breach of WT dictates and then have them in a place where they can be manipulated and controlled.
As I mentioned before, the Hebrews considered male emissions as rendering one ritually unclean for a time, as did a women's menstruation. A man having sex with a menstruating women was the WORST of all possible sins, on the par with murder and idolatry. This violation could NOT be atoned by sacrifice, and was considered to bring a curse on the land, not just on the offending couple but to all inhabitants of the Land of Israel.
(interesting that JWs now state that sex during menstruation is a "matter of conscience" for the married couple. Would WTBTS ALSO state that murder and idolatry are "matters of conscience", too? NO? Why not? You downgraded the sin of sex during menstruation, a law YHWH deemed equally important!)
Some secondary damage could come from people who try to avoid this normal outlet to sexual activity, so they marry young and inappropriately, with all the problems that result from this. The Watchtower creates a problem that does not previously exist, and their is no need for it to exist other than making people fearful and subserviant to them.
Yup, purely a control issue. Nothing more, nothing less: an excuse to exercise control over others.